There have been many references to ideology from our government and media in recent months. Just this week our president signed an executive order regarding stem cell research. In his remarks before the signing he said...
This Order is an important step in advancing the cause of science in America. But let's be clear: promoting science isn't just about providing resources - it is also about protecting free and open inquiry. It is about letting scientists like those here today do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion, and listening to what they tell us, even when it's inconvenient - especially when it's inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda - and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology.
And...
That is why today, I am also signing a Presidential Memorandum directing the head of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to develop a strategy for restoring scientific integrity to government decision making. To ensure that in this new Administration, we base our public policies on the soundest science; that we appoint scientific advisors based on their credentials and experience, not their politics or ideology; and that we are open and honest with the American people about the science behind our decisions.
It is clear from the last quote that politics and ideology are separate in the mind of President Obama. So just what is he referring to when he says ideology? Perhaps it is an assumption on my part, but I believe he is referring to ideas and aims of the religiously pro-life in America. I have no idea if the previous administration established policy on the basis of
ideology [alone], but I would hope that in some way it would play into decisions of any administration. Furthermore, is there not any consideration of the theological and therefore ethical implications of decisions? Dr. Richard Weaver's title comes to mind... "Ideas Have Consequences."
Monday afternoon I received an email from one of the ladies from the church, I believe her thought was very well put. "The frightening lack of any discussion whatsoever of the ethics of the issue - the assumption that if "science" says it's good we should do it is at least as scary as the decision itself"